We Are Church Intl.

News and Media Releases

Latest News

The time is now for change in the Catholic Church

Keynote speech by Mary McAleese, President of Ireland 1997-2011, at the Voices of Faith conference, Rome, 8 March 2018

8 March 2018

The Israelites under Joshua’s command circled Jericho’s walls for seven days, blew trumpets and shouted to make the walls fall down. (cf. Joshua 6:1-20). We don’t have trumpets but we have voices, voices of faith and we are here to shout, to bring down our Church’s walls of mysogyny. We have been circling these walls for 55 years since John XXIII’s encyclical Pacem in Terris first pointed to the advancement of women as one of the most important “signs of the times”.

“they are demanding both in domestic and in public life the rights and duties which belong to them as human persons” [1].[…] The longstanding inferiority complex of certain classes because of their economic and social status, sex, or position in the State, and the corresponding superiority complex of other classes, is rapidly becoming a thing of the past[2].

At the Second Vatican Council Archbishop Paul Hallinan of Atlanta, warned the bishops to stop perpetuating “the secondary place accorded to women in the Church of the 20th century” and to avoid the Church being a “late-comer in [their] social, political and economic development”[3]. The Council’s decree Apostolicam Actuositatem said it was important that women“participate more widely […] in the various sectors of the Church’s apostolate”[4]. The Council’s pastoral constitution Gaudium et Spes said the elimination of discrimination based on gender was a priority[5]. Paul VI even commissioned a study on women in Church and Society[6]. Surely we thought then, the post-Conciliar Church was on the way to full equality for its 600 million female members. And yes-it is true that since the Council new roles and jobs, have opened up to the laity including women but these have simply marginally increased the visibility of women in subordinate roles, including in the Curia, but they have added nothing to their decision-making power or their voice. Remarkably since the Council, roles which were specifically designated as suitable for the laity have been deliberately closed to women. The stable roles of acolyte and lector[7] and the permanent deaconate[8] have been opened only to lay men. Why? Both laymen and women can be temporary altar servers but bishops are allowed to ban females and where they permit them in their dioceses individual pastors can ban them in their parishes[9]. Why?

Back in 1976 we were told that the Church does not consider herself authorized to admit women to priestly ordination[10]. This has locked women out of any significant role in the Church’s leadership, doctrinal development and authority structure since these have historically been reserved to or filtered through ordained men. Yet in divine justice the very fact of the permanent exclusion of women from priesthood and all its consequential exclusions, should have provoked the Church hierarchy to find innovative and transparent ways of including women’s voices as of right and not in trickles of tokenism by tapping, in the divinely instituted College of Bishops and in the man made entities such as the College of Cardinals, the Synod of Bishops and episcopal conferences, in all the places where the faith is shaped by decision and dogma and doctrine. Just imagine this normative scenario- Pope Francis calls a Synod on the role of Women in the Church and 350 male celibates advise the Pope on what women really want! That is how ludicrous our Church has become. How long can the hierarchy sustain the credibility of a God who wants things this way, who wants a Church where women are invisible and voiceless in Church leadership, legal and doctrinal discernment and decision-making?

It was here in this very hall in 1995 that Irish Jesuit theologian, Fr. Gerry O’Hanlon put his finger on the underpinning systemic problem when he steered Decree 14[11] through the Jesuits 34th General Congregation. It is a forgotten document but today we will dust it down and use it to challenge a Jesuit Pope, a reforming Pope, to real, practical action on behalf of women in the Catholic Church.

Decree 14 says:

We have been part of a civil and ecclesial tradition that has offended against women. And, like many men, we have a tendency to convince ourselves that there is no problem. However unwittingly, we have often contributed to a form of clericalism which has reinforced male domination with an ostensibly divine sanction. By making this declaration we wish to react personally and collectively, and do what we can to change this regrettable situation.

“The regrettable situation” arises because the Catholic Church has long since been a primary global carrier of the virus of misogyny. It has never sought a cure though a cure is freely available. Its name is “equality”

Down the 2000 year highway of Christian history came the ethereal divine beauty of the Nativity, the cruel sacrifice of the Crucifixion, the Hallelujah of the Resurrection and the rallying cry of the great commandment to love one another. But down that same highway came man-made toxins such as misogyny and homophobia to say nothing of anti-semitism with their legacy of damaged and wasted lives and deeply embedded institutional dysfunction.

The laws and cultures of many nations and faith systems were also historically deeply patriarchal and excluding of women; some still are, but today the Catholic Church lags noticeably behind the world’s advanced nations in the elimination of discrimination against women. Worse still, because it is the “pulpit of the world” to quote Ban Ki Moon[12] its overt clerical patriarchalism acts as a powerful brake on dismantling the architecture of misogyny wherever it is found. There is an irony here, for education has been crucial to the advancement of women and for many of us, the education which liberated us was provided by the Church’s frontline workers clerical and lay, who have done so much to lift men and women out of poverty and powerlessness and give them access to opportunity. Yet paradoxically it is the questioning voices of educated Catholic women and the courageous men who support them, which the Church hierarchy simply cannot cope with and scorns rather than engaging in dialogue. The Church which regularly criticizes the secular world for its failure to deliver on human rights has almost no culture of critiquing itself. It has a hostility to internal criticism which fosters blinkered servility and which borders on institutional idolatry.

Today we challenge Pope Francis to develop a credible strategy for the inclusion of women as equals throughout the Church’s root and branch infrastructure, including its decision-making. A strategy with targets, pathways and outcomes regularly and independently audited Failure to include women as equals has deprived the Church of fresh and innovative discernment; it has consigned it to recycled thinking among a hermetically sealed cosy male clerical elite flattered and rarely challenged by those tapped for jobs in secret and closed processes. It has kept Christ out and bigotry in. It has left the Church flapping about awkwardly on one wing when God gave it two. We are entitled to hold our Church leaders to account for this and other egregious abuses of institutional power and we will insist on our right to do so no matter how many official doors are closed to us.

At the start of his papacy Pope Francis said “We need to create still broader opportunities for a more incisive female presence in the Church”[13] words a Church scholar described as evidence of Francis’ “magnanimity”[14]. Let us be clear, women’s right to equality in the Church arises organically from divine justice. It should not depend on ad hoc papal benevolence.

Pope Francis described female theologians as the “strawberries on the cake”[15]. He was wrong. Women are the leaven in the cake. They are the primary handers on of the faith to their children. In the Western world the Church’s cake is not rising, the baton of faith is dropping. Women are walking away from the Catholic Church in droves, for those who are expected to be key influencers in their children’s faith formation have no opportunity to be key influencers in the formation of the Catholic faith. That is no longer acceptable. Just four months ago the Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin felt compelled to remark that “the low standing of women in the Catholic Church is the most significant reason for the feeling of alienation towards it in Ireland today”[16].

Yet Pope Francis has said that “women are more important than men because the Church is a woman”[17]. Holy Father, why not ask women if they feel more important than men? I suspect many will answer that they experience the Church as a male bastion of patronizing platitudes to which Pope Francis has added his quota.

John Paul II has written of the ‘mystery of women’[18]. Talk to us as equals and we will not be a mystery! Francis has said a “deeper theology of women”[19] is needed. God knows it would be hard to find a more shallow theology of women than the misogyny dressed up as theology[20] which the magisterium currently hides behind.

And all the time a deeper theology is staring us in the face. It does not require much digging to find it. Just look to Christ. John Paul II pointed out that:

‘we are heirs to a history which has conditioned us to a remarkable extent. In every time and place, this conditioning has been an obstacle to the progress of women. […] Transcending the established norms of his own culture, Jesus treated women with openness, respect, acceptance and tenderness….As we look to Christ…. it is natural to ask ourselves: how much of his message has been heard and acted upon?’

Women are best qualified to answer that question but we are left to talk among ourselves. No Church leader bothers to turn up not just because we do not matter to them but because their priestly formation prepares them to resist treating us as true equals.

Back in this hall in 1995 the Jesuit Congregation asked God for the grace of conversion from a patriarchal Church to a Church of equals; a Church where women truly matter not on terms designed by men for a patriarchal Church but on terms which make Christ matter. Only such a Church of equals is worthy of Christ. Only such a Church can credibly make Christ matter. The time for that Church is now, Pope Francis. The time for change is now.

References

[1] John XXIII encyclical Pacem in terris, 11 April 1963, n. 41.

[2] Ibid. n. 43

[3] Cf. Fr. P. Jordan O.S.B., NCWC News Rome correspondent «Changes proposed in role of women in the Church» posted 12 October 1965. Cf. https://vaticaniiat50.wordpress.com /2015/10/12/ changes-proposed-in-role-of-women-in-the-church/

[4] Second Vatican Council, Decree Apostolicam Actuositatem, 18 November 1965, n. 9 in AAS58 (1966), 846-.

[5] Cf. Second Vatican Council, Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes, 7 December 1965, n. 29 in AAS 58 (1966), 1048-1049.

[6] It reported in 1976.

[7] 1983 Code of Canon Law, can. 230 §1. Cf. Paul VI, apostolic letter, Ministeria Quaedam, 15 August 1972, n. 2-4; 7, in AAS 64 (1972) 529-534. Formerly called the minor orders of acolyte and lector, they are: henceforth to be called ministries. Ministries may be assigned to lay Christians; hence they are no longer to be considered as reserved to candidates for the sacrament of orders. […] In accordance with the ancient tradition of the Church, institution to the ministries of reader and acolyte is reserved to men.

[8] 1983 Code of Canon Law, can. 1031 §2. In 2016 Pope Francis set up a Commission to look at the question of ordaining women to the Diaconate. The report is believed to have been on his desk for a year as of March 2018.

[9] Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments, letter Concerning the use of female altar servers, 27 July 2001.

[10] Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, declaration Inter Insigniores, On the question of the ordination of women to the ministerial priesthood, 15 October 15 1976.

[11] Written with the help among others of two Irish laywomen, Cathy Molloy and Edel O’Kennedy. For the background to the Decree cf. M.J. Heydt, «Solving the Mystery of Decree 14: Jesuits and the situation of women in Church and civil society» http://www.conversationsmagazine.org/web-features/2015/12/27/solving-the-mystery-of-decree-14-jesuits-and-the-situation-of-women-in-church-and-civil-society

[12] Per UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon in his opening introduction at the UNGA Seventieth Session, 25 September 2015, UN Doc A/70/PV.3, 1.

[13] Francis, apostolic exhortation Evangelii Gaudium, 24 November 2013, n. 103 in AAS 105 (2013) 1019-1137. Cf. Francis interview with Fr. A. Spadaro SJ for America magazine in which he repeated these words, 30 September 2013 (as amended online).

[14] P. Zagano, «What the Pope really said», NCRonline 25 September 2013 https:// www.ncronline.org/blogs/just-catholic/what-pope-really-said.

[15] Francis, Address to the International Theological Commission, 5 December 2014. Cf. H. Roberts «Women theologians are ‘the strawberry on the cake, says Pope», The Tablet 11 December 2014.

[16] From a talk entitled “The church in Dublin: where will it be in 10 years’ time?” at St Mary’s Church, Haddington Road, as reported in the Irish Times, November 16 2017.

[17] Response of Pope Francis to a question from a journalist: “Will we one day see women priests in the Catholic Church?” on papal plane returning to Rome from the United States, Sept. 29, 2015. Cf. https://www.ncr online.org/blogs/francis-chronicles/popes-quotes-theology-women

[18] John Paul II, apostolic letter, Mulieris Dignitatem, n. 15 August 1988 in AAS 80 (1988) 1653-1729.

[19] Interview with journalists on board plane on way to Rio de Janeiro 22 July 2013 cf. John Allen «The Pope on Homosexuals. Who am I to judge?», NCRonline https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/pope-homosexuals-who-am-i-judge

[20] Cf. Manfred Hauke, Women in the priesthood. A Systematic Analysis in the Light of the Order of Creation and Redemption, Ignatius Press, 1988.

Decree 14: “Jesuits and the Situation of Women in Church and Civil Society,”

In her Voices of Faith address on 8 March 2018, Dr.Mary MacAleese referred to a call by the Jesuits to redress the situation of women in the RCC. This was resolved at the General Congregation of the Society of Jesus: Decree 14: “Jesuits and the Situation of Women in Church and Civil Society,” General Congregation 34 (1995). The full text is well worth reading. See link below from Boston College:https://jesuitportal.bc.edu/research/documents/1995_decree14gc34/. It reveals very dear intentions, although twenty-three years later the situation does not seem to have changed much for women in the Church!

La crédibilité du pape François sur les abus sexuels du clergé a été sapée au Chili

La crédibilité du pape François sur les abus sexuels du clergé a été sapée au Chili

Le voyage du pape François en Amérique du Sud a reflété l'attention habituelle du pape pour la réalité des souffrances des pauvres et des populations indigènes marginalisées. Mais sa visite a aussi démontré le manque de clarté du pape sur la priorité donnée aux victimes et aux survivants d’abus sexuels commis par des membres du clergé, et a en outre sapé les efforts de l'Église pour montrer sa repentance sur cette question importante.

Dans son discours à la "Moneda" devant les autorités civiles chiliennes, le pape a demandé pardon et a exprimé sa honte pour les abus sexuels commis par des membres du clergé. Le pape François a aussi reçu une délégation des victimes à huis clos. Ce sont des étapes importantes, mais il n'a pas montré la même ouverture envers les victimes de Karadima.

Ces faits positifs ont été cependant complètement compromis quand le pape François a déclaré que ceux qui ont accusé Mgr Juan Barros Madrid de couvrir des abus sexuels commis sur des enfants étaient coupables de « calomnie ».

Mgr Juan Barros Madrid a été nommé évêque d'Osorno en 2015, alors que sa complicité avec Karadima était devenue publique ; il avait été auparavant évêque aux Armées. Sa nomination a été faite par la hiérarchie au Chili, qui s’était montrée d'accord avec la dictature de Pinochet et appréciait l'empathie du Nonce Angelo Sodano. Mgr Barros a été le protecteur du pédophile en série, le père Fernando Karadima, figure influente et bien connue de l'élite économique et conservatrice du monde catholique de Santiago. Les membres de la Commission pontificale pour la protection des mineurs ont protesté de sa nomination, mais le pape François est passé outre. On ne pense pas que Mgr Barros ait lui-même commis des abus ; mais il était certainement conscient de ceux en série de Karadima qu'il a protégé.

Un mouvement de base est alors né dans le diocèse d'Osorno qui a contesté et rejeté la nomination de Barros, demandant au pape de le révoquer. Le pape François, parlant avec des journaliste avant de quitter le Chili, a déclaré qu'il n'y avait aucune preuve contre Barros et accusé les survivants d'abus de calomnie. Pourtant, les survivants des abus de Karadima – que le pape François a refusé de rencontrer – se confirment être crédibles. En fait, le cardinal Sean O'Malley de Boston, qui dirige la Commission pontificale pour la protection des mineurs, a publié une déclaration exprimant que la défense par le pontife d'un évêque chilien accusé de couvrir des abus était « une source de grande douleur » pour les survivants. Il y a également eu une réponse du président des laïcs d'Osorno : « Le Pape devrait comprendre qu'il n'est pas un jury, il n'a pas à se prononcer sur les crimes, qui seront jugés par un jury chilien, son devoir est de vérifier si l'évêque Juan Barros est vraiment un chef spirituel ou non, et de comprendre qu'il ne remplit pas sa mission en tant qu'évêque : être un signe d'unité dans un diocèse ».

We Are Church International (WAC) et le réseau européen Églises en liberté (EN) expriment leur soutien à la protestation ecclésiastique légitime des chrétiens d’Osorno et partagent le point de vue de Somos Iglesia Chile (section nationale du mouvement WAC) dans cette affaire.

Nous appelons le Pape François à revoir d'urgence son soutien à Mgr Juan Barros dans l’intérêt de toute l'Église.

Sigrid Grabmeier, présidente de WAC International

Enrique Orellana F., président de Somos Iglesia Chile

Raquel Mallavibarrena, présidente du Réseau européen Églises en libertés

 

La credibilità di papa Francesco, per quanto riguarda gli abusi del clero sui minori, è stata pregiudicata in Cile

Il viaggio di papa Francesco in Sud America ha manifestato l’attenzione abituale del papa alle sofferenze  delle popolazioni native, povere e  marginalizzate. Però la sua visita  ha anche dimostrato  mancanza di chiarezza nel dare la priorità  alle vittime degli abusi sessuali del clero e ha pregiudicato   gli sforzi della Chiesa per dimostrare il suo pentimento su questa importante questione.

Il papa ha chiesto perdono e ha manifestato la sua vergogna per gli abusi del clero parlando alla “Moneda” alle autorità civili cilene. Papa Francesco ha anche ricevuto un delegazione di alcune delle vittime a  porte chiuse. Sono stati passi  importanti però egli non ha avuto la stessa apertura e disponibilità nei confronti delle vittime di Karadima. Gli  interventi positivi sono stati del tutto compromessi quando il papa ha detto che quelli che avevano accusato il vescovo Juan Barros Madrid di aver “coperto”  abusi sessuali sui minori erano colpevoli di calunnia.

Il vescovo Juan Barros Madrid fu nominato vescovo di Osorno nel 2015 dopo che la sua complicità con Karadima divenne conosciuta; prima era stato vescovo castrense.  La sua nomina è la diretta conseguenza di una gerarchia che era in sintonia con la dittatura di Pinochet ed aveva la simpatia del nunzio Angelo Sodano.  Egli era il protettore del Padre Fernando Karadima,  pedofilo  seriale e figura molto influente e conosciuta nella élite economica e conservatrice del mondo cattolico cileno. Membri della Pontificia Commissione per la protezione dei minori contestarono la nomina ma papa Francesco procedette ugualmente. Il  vescovo Barros  non è  accusato di avere  egli stesso compiuto abusi; ma  era certamente consapevole degli abusi in serie di Karadima, che egli poi ha protetto.

Dopo tutto ciò nella diocesi di Osorno è sorto  un movimento di base  che ha discusso e  rifiutato la nomina di Barros  e ha chiesto, alla fine,  al  papa la  revoca del vescovo. Papa Francesco, parlando con un giornalista prima di lasciare il Cile, ha detto che non c’erano prove nei confronti di Barros  ed ha accusato di calunnia le vittime degli abusi.  Senza alcun dubbio  le vittime di Karadima -che il papa ha rifiutato di incontrare- sono risultate del tutto credibili.  Infatti il Card. Seàn O’Malley di Boston, che è il presidente della Pontificia Commissione per la Protezione dei Minori, ha rilasciato una dichiarazione secondo la quale la difesa da parte del papa del vescovo cileno accusato di coprire abusi è stata “motivo di gran dolore”per le vittime. Si è avuta anche una replica del portavoce dei laici di Osorno: “Il papa deve capire che egli non è un tribunale, che non deve  giudicare i reati - questo spetta ai tribunali cileni- e che quello che egli dovrebbe fare  è vedere se il vescovo Juan Barros è o non è   una guida spirituale ed inoltre comprendere che egli non  sta compiendo la sua missione di vescovo… cioè quella di  essere segno di unità nella diocesi”.

L’International Movement We Are Church (WAC) e l’European Network Church on The Move (EN-RE) esprimono il loro appoggio alla legittima protesta dei cristiani di Osorno e condividono l’opinione di Somos Iglesia del Cile (sezione nazionale del movimento WAC) su questa questione. Noi chiediamo a papa Francesco di riconsiderare urgentemente il suo appoggio al vescovo Barros per il bene di tutta la chiesa.

Sigrid Grabmeier                Enrique Orellana F.               Raquel Mallavibarrena    

Chair                                      Chair                                      Chair

WAC International             Somos Iglesia Chile               European Network Church on the Move

Rome, 25 january 2018

 

Contact: Marianne Duddy-Burke, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., +1 617 669 7810 Executive Director, Dignity USA

Raquel Mallavibarrena, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., +34 649332654

We are Church International founded in Rome in 1996, is  global coalition of national church reform groups. It is committed to the renewal of the Roman Catholic Church based on the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) and the theological spirit developed from it. https://www.we-are-church.org/413/index.php

The European Network Church on the Move is  spontaneous convergence of organizations – associations, communities, informal groups and networks – of European Christians who are in majority Catholic, sharing:

(1) the vision of  Church prophetic, ecumenical, liberating, supporting, loving, which neither excludes nor discriminates and which follows on the steps of Jesus the liberator

(2) the will to work, respecting cultural and religious diversity, for peace, justice, freedom, human rights and democracy, including in the Catholic Church http://www.en-re.eu/index.php

La credibilidad del Papa Francisco con respecto al abuso clerical se ha visto socavada en Chile

La credibilidad del Papa Francisco con respecto al abuso clerical se ha visto socavada en Chile

El viaje del Papa Francisco a América del Sur reflejó la atención habitual del Papa a la realidad de los sufrimientos de las poblaciones nativas pobres y marginadas. Pero su visita también demostró la falta de claridad del Papa en la prioridad  de  las víctimas y sobrevivientes del abuso sexual clerical, y socavó aún más los esfuerzos de la Iglesia para mostrar su arrepentimiento en este importante tema.

El Papa pidió perdón y expresó su vergüenza por los abusadores sexuales en su alocución en la "Moneda" ante las autoridades civiles de Chile. El Papa Francisco también recibió una delegación de algunas de las víctimas a puerta cerrada. Estos fueron pasos importantes, pero  no tuvo la misma apertura y disposición con los abusados por Karadima.  

Sin embargo, estos eventos positivos fueron completamente socavados por el Papa Francisco al decir que aquellos que acusaron al Obispo Juan Barros Madrid de encubrir abuso sexual infantil fueron culpables de "calumnia".

El obispo Juan Barros Madrid fue nombrado obispo de Osorno en 2015. Al saberse su complicidad con Karadima fue trasladado a Osorno, antes era obispo castrense. Su nombramiento viene como consecuencia de una jerarquía existente desde hace tiempo y  acorde con la dictadura de Pinochet  y con la empatía del nuncio Angelo Sodano.  Fue el protector del pedófilo en serie Fernando Karadima, una figura influyente y conocida de la élite económica y conservadora en el mundo católico del país. Los miembros de la Pontificia Comisión para la Protección de Menores protestaron por el nombramiento, pero el Papa Francisco siguió adelante con ello. No hay ninguna sugerencia de que el Obispo Barros sea un abusador, pero sí un encubridor; sin duda era consciente del abuso en serie de Karadima a quien protegía.

Entonces nació un movimiento de base en la diócesis de Osorno que disputa y rechaza el nombramiento de Barros, pidiendo al Papa que lo revoque. El Papa Francisco, hablando con un periodista antes de abandonar Chile, dijo que no había evidencia contra Barros y acusó a los sobrevivientes  de difamación. Sin embargo, los supervivientes del abuso de Karadima, a quienes el Papa Francisco se negó a ver, han sido confirmados como creíbles. De hecho, el cardenal Seán O'Malley de Boston, que preside la Pontificia Comisión para la Protección de Menores, ha emitido una declaración según la cual la defensa del pontífice de un obispo chileno acusado de encubrir  abusos es "una fuente de gran dolor" para las víctimas. Hubo también una réplica del portavoz de los Laicos de Osorno: " el Papa tiene que comprender que él no es un tribunal, que los delitos no tiene por qué juzgarlos él, sino los tribunales chilenos, y  lo que tiene que hacer es ver si el obispo  Juan Barros es de verdad o no un líder espiritual y comprender que  no está cumpliendo la misión de un obispo... que es ser signo de unidad de una diócesis"

Somos Iglesia Internacional (WAC) y la Red Europea Iglesia por la Libertad (EN-RE) expresan su apoyo a la legítima protesta eclesiástica de los cristianos de Osorno y comparten la opinión de Somos Iglesia Chile (sección nacional del movimiento WAC) en este asunto. Pedimos al Papa Francisco que reconsidere urgentemente su apoyo al  Obispo Juan Barros por el bien de toda la Iglesia.

Sigrid Grabmeier                Enrique Orellana F.              Raquel Mallavibarrena    

Chair                                      Chair                                      Chair

WAC International             Somos Iglesia Chile             European Network Church on the Move

Contact: Marianne Duddy-Burke, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., +1 617 669 7810 Executive Director, DignityUSA

Raquel Mallavibarrena, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., +34 649332654

We Are Church International fundada en Roma en 1996, es una coalición global de grupos nacionales de reforma de la iglesia. Está comprometida en la renovación de la Iglesia Católica Romana basada en el Concilio Vaticano II (1962-1965) y el espíritu teológico desarrollado a partir de él. https://www.we-are-church.org/413/index.php

The European Network Church on the Move es una convergencia espontánea de organizaciones – asociaciones, comunidades, grupos informales  y redes – de cristianos europeos, que son católicos en su mayoría, y que comparten

(1) el planteamiento de una Iglesia profética, ecuménica, liberadora, que apoya, que ama, que nunca excluye ni discrimina y que sigue los pasos de Jesús el libertador,

(2) la voluntad de trabajar respetando la diversidad cultural y religiosa, en favor de la paz, la justicia, la libertad, los derechos humanos y la democracia en el mundo y también en la Iglesia Católica. http://www.en-re.eu/index.php